Search

Help

Log in

Forum

Events

Gallery

Clubs

You are here: Forum Index -> Historical Combat
bayonet/long gun combination style

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic     View previous topic :: View next topic  
 
Author Message
Phil Berghan-Whyman



Location: Wellington

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:33 pm     bayonet/long gun combination style Reply with quote

Oskar der Drachen wrote:
Forgive a newb question here?

It would seem to me that a bayonet/long gun combination style would be distinctly Western in it's approach, but I have not seen this type of fighting mentioned in the thread to date.

Is this too modern an style to be included? I was trying to cast my mind back along the historical weeapons fighting I know of, and who were firearms practitioners. I know the East had the beginning of this in gunpowder weapons, but I don't remember seeing any combination of this in a single weapons form in that genre.

Surely since the earliest days of the "modern" gunpowder weapons, this has been a taught school of fighting? Less so since the range and repeating nature of weapons progressed, but for the main part of the firearms span of history this has been a main form of the weapons utility?

With Whom and Where did this school of combat originate?


I thought this was a good questions and didn't want it getting lost with the thread - so here it is.

_________________
Phil Berghan-Whyman
"Hand me the sword and ask me the question again"
http://www.handypaladin.co.nz
Colin



Location: Wellington

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 2:37 pm      Reply with quote

I mentioned bayonet fencing in passing with Colonel Biddle above. Yes, it was taught. Biddle, for example, made some modifications in how to parry the outside line (though nothing terribly drastic that I couldn't point out the equivalent in various smallsword treatises doing similar).

Bayonet fencing competitions continued into the 20th century.

The WWII British bayonet training manual that I've got "Small Arms Training: Volume 1, Pamphlet No.12, Bayonet, 1942" is very simple. It is far more simple than Biddle's one. It certainly doesn't bother to trace its origins.

Hard to say who invented bayonet fencing first. At a guess French, but I've got nothing to back that up with (except a bit of etymology). It is solidly based on "civilian" fencing methods. There were plenty of 19th century bayonet manuals written. At some point I intend to teach it.

As a point of interest le Baton in savate was based originally on bayonet fencing and was used by the French in WWI.

_________________
The person who writes for fools is always sure of a large audience.
- Arthur Schopenhauer

See http://www.swordsmanship.co.nz/
pmel018
Principal Sponsor


Location: Wokingham, near Reading, UK

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:58 am      Reply with quote

Bayonet fencing seems to have begun as the weapon that the bayonet was attached to became more efficient, more accurate, reliable and had a longer range. The bayonets original purpose was to do duty as a pike, and as such allowed every musketeer(for want of a better term)a method of defense against cavalry while the complicated and time consuming proceedure of reloading was carried out. So essentially the bayonet was a defensive arm, this mindset perhaps best demonstrated at the Battle of Warerloo when the British infantry, drawn up in squares, managed to hold off the best cavalry that the French had.
As both artilery and smallarms increased in range power and accuracy the notion of standing ones ground in neat lines became suicidal. Both Crimea and the American Civil War demonstrated the carnage that was posible. However the main infantry weapon was still a single shot musket and it was still necessay for a soldier to defend himself against cavalry as well asadvance offensively in open order once the single shot was expended(and before a reload was possible)It is around the middle part of the 19th C that the idea of bayonet on bayonet combat organised and taught in a methodical and comprehensive really flourished. bayonet drill was, and still is, seen as a method of instilling an aggresive spirit in an infantrymn. By the end of the 19C repeating rifles were in service with all modern armies and the machinegun was appearing all over.Nevertheless the long bayonet was still seen as a valid weapon and methods were continually developed and refined, practised as bayonet fencing. as colin points out many manuals were produced right up to the latest U.S.M.C H2H manual. The last one i have seen that promotes the use of the bayonet in the classical fencing format is John Styers "Cold Steel" which owes a considerable debt to Biddles "Do Or Die" After this point the wepons begin thbecome more compact, lighter and more especially shorter.The US army now uses pugil sticks tosimulate bayonet fighting.
At Fightcamp last year there was a demonstration of WW1 British bayonet training and it ain't as easy as it looks.
Phil
conal
Site Admin



PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:05 pm      Reply with quote

John Styers "Cold Steel"
-http://www.vrazvedka.ru/main/learning/ruk-b/styers.html

Cheers Phil.
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Back to top
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group Please read the terms of use Contact the Site Admin
Your donations help keep this site ad-free